Our responses to reviews and inquiries

GMC Response to Independent Neurology Inquiry Report

Overview

The Independent Neurology Inquiry to reviewed the circumstances that led to the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust’s recall of neurology patients. This was following concerns about the clinical practice of former doctor, Michael Watt. The Inquiry published their report earlier this year. Our response sets out how we are addressing recommendations for the GMC, highlighting the steps we will take in three key areas.

• Raising concerns. 
• Revalidation and local clinical governance.
• Sharing information and accountability in our fitness to practise processes.

Gosport War Memorial Hospital Report: GMC response

Overview

This report summarises the major changes that have occurred since the terrible events at Gosport War Memorial Hospital. It details the crucial learnings and actions we are now taking in response to the Panel report.

The 2017 responses to reviews and inquiries

Overview

This update provides an overview about how we addressed themes from recent inquiries and reviews. Including the 2012 Francis report.

It shows the impact our work to promote a more collaborative and patient-focused culture has had on healthcare regulation.

The 2016 responses to reviews and inquiries

Overview

In 2015 we published an update on our work to address the recommendations from Sir Robert Francis’ 2013 report on the failings at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust. This also incorporated our work relating to other published inquiries and reviews.

2016 was a quiet year with no major inquiry or review publications directly affecting our work. We continue to work closely and cooperate with various ongoing inquiries and reviews. As a listening and learning organisation we'll continue to assist inquiries and reviews.

The 2015 responses to reviews and inquiries

Overview

This update highlights the work undertaken over the year to promote a more collaborative and patient-focused culture in healthcare regulation. It focuses on four themes:

• Patients’ insight. Includes development of the Patient Information Service.
• Being open and honest. Includes our joint work with the Nursing and Midwifery Council on Duty of candour. How we raise awareness of our guidance and development of the National Training Survey.
• Professionalism. Includes our new standards for education and training. Development of generic professional capabilities, the work of the Regional Liaison Service and our professionalism events.
• Collaboration and information sharing. Includes work to strengthen relationships with the Care Quality Commission and other systems regulators.

The October 2014 responses to reviews and inquiries

Overview

This update consolidates our previous responses to provide a summary of how we are responding to the recommendations from the Francis Inquiry.

It also describes how we have responded to related reviews. For example the Berwick Review into patient safety, the Clwyd Hart Review of the NHS complaints system and the Keogh Review of quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospitals with high mortality indicators.

We've also set out how we're addressing the 24 Francis recommendations bearing on our work in Annex A.

The April 2014 responses to reviews and inquiries

Overview

This update includes more on our work on the recommendations of the Keogh Review. This looked into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospitals with high mortality indicators. The Berwick Review into patient safety and the pledges we made to the Clwyd Hart review of the NHS complaints system.

We remain committed to tackling the wider issues highlighted by the Francis Report as a whole. And in playing our part in helping promote a more open, patient-focused culture in health and regulation.

The successful delivery of many of these recommendations and the wider agenda as a whole depends on many organisations and continuing to work together to deliver changes and meet the challenges highlighted.

The October 2013 responses to reviews and inquiries

Overview

In our initial response to the recommendations in the Francis Report, we committed to providing an update on our progress in six months.

In that time, the Government has commissioned six further reviews to inform its response to the Francis Report. Some of which are due to be published later this year.

The Keogh Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospitals with high mortality indicators. The Berwick Review into patient safety and Cavendish Review of the regulation of healthcare assistants have been published.

The delivery of many of these recommendations will require action from a number of organisations. We have been engaging with the Department of Health and other regulators to make sure we work closely to help deliver the changes suggested.

This update groups the recommendations across the six themes. In addition to explaining the work in relation to the specifics of these recommendations, we are also committed to tackling the wider issues highlighted by the Francis Report. In particular playing our part in helping to promote a more open, patient focused culture in health and regulation.

The April 2013 responses to reviews and inquiries

Overview

Patients and their families were badly let down by the failures of care at Mid-Staffordshire NHS Trust. We are determined to play our part by helping to raise standards to try to make sure this never happens again. 

As the Francis report recognised, we have already taken some important steps to help create a safer health service for patients. Particularly with the roll out of regular checks for doctors with the introduction of revalidation. The setting up of local GMC teams to work with the NHS, doctors and patients, and through the major reforms of our fitness to practise procedures.  

We have made progress, but we know there is more to do. If we are to help prevent another tragedy and improve care for patients we, along with everyone else in the healthcare system, need to work together.  

The reforms we have underway reflect our determination to be a more outward facing, proactive and responsive regulator. In this initial report we have responded to each of Robert Francis’ recommendations and provided detail of what we are attempting to do.