Working with doctors Working for patients


GMC unveils blueprint for better medical training

Press Release

31 Mar 2017

Flexible training plan aims to improve training paths for doctors

If postgraduate training in the UK looks the same in five years’ time, then we will have failed trainees and we will have failed patients

Charlie Massey, GMC Chief Executive

Rigid training that adapts too slowly needs radical overhaul to provide trainees with more flexibility and patients with doctors who can care for multiple health conditions, the GMC’s plan for training tells health leaders today.

The plan follows a review of training which the Secretary of State for Health asked the GMC to carry out during the contract dispute in 2016, an analysis which heard from trainees, trainers, patients and the medical colleges and faculties.

The GMC was told the current approach to training is out of date and in urgent need of reform. The inflexible approach to postgraduate training is caused partly by the complexity of training structures.

Many of the 66 specialties and 32 subspecialties develop their training requirements in isolation from each other. While there are inherent differences between specialties, this creates barriers for trainees who seek to change specialty. The same structures limit the ability of postgraduate training to adapt to a changing population and service needs.

The plan identifies five key barriers to improving training flexibility:

  • Transferring between specialties is difficult without doctors going back to the start – often referred to as the ‘snakes and ladders’ effect. This is caused by the complex legal framework controlling UK postgraduate training
  • Training in other ways is not recognised – work overseas and experience gained in non-training grade posts are not counted;
  • More career support is needed to help doctors who want to refocus their training without starting from square one;
  • Postgraduate training is slow to adapt to changes in patient demand
  • Rigid training structures can make rota gaps worse.

Charlie Massey, Chief Executive of the GMC, said:

‘The way that medical training has developed in the last 30 years has contributed to the low morale that doctors in training continue to experience.

‘The actions that we set out in our report can make a meaningful difference to the professional lives of doctors and the choices they make about their careers. But ultimately it is patients who will benefit the most from these changes.

‘We are ideally placed to drive these changes forward but we cannot deliver more flexibility and choice for doctors on our own. We need all bodies involved in the delivery of UK medical education to work with us and be as determined as we are to deliver this ambitious vision.

‘If postgraduate training in the UK looks the same in five years’ time, then we will have failed trainees and we will have failed patients.’

In Adapting for the future, the GMC proposes a seven-point plan geared to delivering more flexible training:

  • Training will be organised by outcomes rather than time spent in training
  • Related specialties curricula, will share common outcomes and elements
  • The GMC will reduce the burden of its approval system so that medical colleges and faculties can make changes to postgraduate curricula more quickly
  • The GMC will work with others to promote mechanisms which already exist to help trainees change training programmes – such as the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ Accreditation of Transferable Competences Framework
  • The GMC will ask the UK government to make the law less restrictive so that we can be more agile in approving training
  • The GMC will support doctors with specific capabilities or needs
  • The GMC will encourage national education bodies to continue to improve the work-life balance of trainees.

The GMC, which has overseen postgraduate training in all four countries of the UK since 2010, will require training to focus more on the generic professional capabilities common to all doctors. Medical specialties will be asked to work together to identify aspects of their training that are common across related areas of practice, enabling doctors to switch specialties more easily.

The GMC will now work with the Academy, the medical colleges and faculties, the national education bodies, and professional organisations of the four UK countries to develop the plans further.

Notes to editors

1. The full report can be found here.
2. The GMC was asked to carry out a review into the flexibility of training at the request of government and professional bodies during talks to resolve the junior doctor contract dispute in England in 2016. The GMC agreed on the basis that the review would apply to all four UK countries, over hich the GMC has regulatory oversight of training and education.

3. The General Medical Council (GMC) is an independent organisation that helps to protect patients and improve medical education and practice across the UK.

  • We decide which doctors are qualified to work here and we oversee UK medical education and training.
  • We set the standards that doctors need to follow, and make sure that they continue to meet these standards throughout their careers.
  • We take action when we believe a doctor may be putting the safety of patients, or the public's confidence in doctors, at risk.

We are independent of government and the medical profession and accountable to Parliament. Our powers are given to us by Parliament through the Medical Act 1983.

We are a registered charity (number 1089278 with the Charity Commission for England and Wales, and number SC037750 with the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator), we have to show that our aims are for public benefit.

The GMC Media Relations Office can be contacted on 020 7189 5454, email press@gmc-uk.org.

To find out more please visit our website www.gmc-uk.org.

Join us on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google+ and YouTube.