|

Chairman, the Environment Agency
|
Diagnosing the Good Doctor
"The relationship between doctor and patient has changed almost beyond recognition in recent years. Deferential respect for paternalistic wisdom has given way to a much more equal standing between the two parties - though at its best it remains one that is based on respect for knowledge, expertise and experience on the one hand and respect for the humanity of the patient and their wish to know on the other.
I remember one of my doctors saying to me - shortly after my HIV diagnosis - that he couldn't say for certain what the prognosis was going to be, but that "I needed to learn to live with uncertainty". It's actually not a bad lesson for life generally, but it embodied exactly the approach I needed from my doctor. It accepted that I (like many other patients in a similar position) knew quite a lot about the risks, the hopes, the state of knowledge, and the things that weren't known, about this disease. But based in an expert viewpoint, it helped me to understand all of those things better. Recognising the knowledge and experience of the patient as well as the knowledge and experience of the doctor, and building on that rather than ignoring it: this is what good doctoring is all about.
There will be times, of course, when the patient knows little or nothing, is scared and troubled, and may have imagined the very worst. Then a doctor's calm reassurance is needed. When the patient knows a lot more, has researched a lot more, calmness and reassurance (and sometimes gentle correction) may still be the order of the day, but in a rather different way. In both cases, though, respect is what matters. It's more than half the battle."
|